The logging stack (Alloy -> Loki -> Grafana) was implemented but no Grafana dashboards were created. Grafana at https://logs.motovaultpro.com currently has only the Loki datasource provisioned (config/grafana/datasources/loki.yml) with no dashboards or alerting rules. We need file-based provisioned dashboards to easily spot and debug errors across all 9 containers.
Current State
Grafana 12.4.0 running at https://logs.motovaultpro.com
Loki datasource configured and working
Alloy collecting Docker logs from all 9 containers with labels: container, service
File-based provisioning: Dashboard JSON files in config/grafana/dashboards/ with a provisioning YAML config, auto-loaded on container startup. Must be version-controlled and reproducible.
Dashboards (4 total)
1. Application Overview Dashboard
Container log volume over time (per container)
Error rate across all containers (error count / total log count)
Log level distribution (info, warn, error) per container
Container health status (log activity presence)
Total request count over time
2. API Performance Dashboard
Request rate over time (requests per second)
Response time distribution (p50, p95, p99 from duration field)
HTTP status code distribution (2xx, 3xx, 4xx, 5xx)
Slowest endpoints (top-N by duration)
Request volume by endpoint (path field)
Status code breakdown by endpoint
3. Error Investigation Dashboard
Error log stream (live tail of error-level logs)
Error rate over time (error count per time interval)
Errors by container
Errors by endpoint (path field)
Stack trace viewer (error + stack fields)
Correlation ID lookup panel (search by requestId)
Recent 5xx responses
4. Infrastructure Dashboard
Per-container log throughput
PostgreSQL error/warning logs
Redis connection and command logs
Traefik access logs and error logs
OCR service logs and processing errors
Loki ingestion rate
Alerting Rules
Error rate spike: Alert when error rate exceeds threshold over a time window
Container silence: Alert when a container stops producing logs (potential crash/hang)
5xx spike: Alert when 5xx HTTP response rate exceeds threshold
Codebase Analysis: Reviewed all Grafana, Alloy, Loki, and backend logging configuration. Current state: Grafana 12.4.0 running with only Loki datasource provisioned. No dashboards, no alerting, no provisioning directory.
Decision Critic Verdict: STAND. All 7 verifiable claims passed. File-based provisioning confirmed supported. Key adjustment: log-based percentile metrics are approximations (no Prometheus), acceptable for current stack. Recommend webhook placeholder for future push alerting.
Deliverables:
Create config/grafana/dashboards/api-performance.json with 6 panels:
Request Rate Over Time (timeseries, req/s)
Response Time Distribution (timeseries, p50/p95/p99 via quantile_over_time + unwrap duration)
HTTP Status Code Distribution (pie chart)
Slowest Endpoints (table, top-10 by avg duration)
Request Volume by Endpoint (bar chart)
Status Code Breakdown by Endpoint (table)
Note: Percentile calculations are log-based approximations. All queries filter on msg="Request processed" to isolate request logs from other backend logs.
The first mount maps the host directory config/grafana/provisioning/ to the container path /etc/grafana/provisioning/dashboards/. This means dashboards.yml would appear inside the container at /etc/grafana/provisioning/dashboards/dashboards.yml. Grafana expects the provider configuration YAML to be at /etc/grafana/provisioning/dashboards/*.yml -- so the file location is technically correct.
However, the existing datasource provisioning uses a different pattern:
This maps config/grafana/datasources/ (which contains loki.yml) directly to the provisioning subdirectory. For consistency and clarity, the dashboard provisioning YAML should follow the same pattern. The plan should use:
or simply place dashboards.yml inside config/grafana/dashboards/ alongside the JSON files (Grafana will ignore non-YAML files when loading provider configs, and the dashboards.yml points to a path which can be the same directory or a subdirectory).
Single mount: ./config/grafana/dashboards:/etc/grafana/provisioning/dashboards:ro for the provider config
Second mount: ./config/grafana/dashboards:/var/lib/grafana/dashboards:ro for the JSON files
Or separate directories to avoid confusion. Either way, the plan must be explicit about which files live in which host directory.
F2. HIGH -- M6 alerting volume mount not specified in M1
Location: M1 deliverable 3 vs M6 deliverable 4
Issue: M1 defines the docker-compose volume mounts but only lists two (dashboard provisioning + dashboard JSON files). M6 deliverable 4 says "Modify docker-compose.yml - Mount alerting provisioning directory" -- but M1 claims to be the complete provisioning infrastructure milestone. This creates ambiguity: does M1 deliver the complete volume mount set, or does M6 add another mount later?
The alerting files at config/grafana/provisioning/alerting/ need a mount to /etc/grafana/provisioning/alerting/ inside the container. This mount should be specified in M1 (the infrastructure milestone) rather than deferred to M6, since M1's purpose is "Provisioning Infrastructure."
Suggested fix: Add the alerting provisioning mount to M1 deliverable 3:
The unwrap expression must come before the range selector in LogQL. The correct order is: | unwrap duration | __error__="" [5m]. The __error__="" filter after unwrap is best practice to drop entries where unwrap fails (non-numeric duration values).
by () with empty parentheses is valid LogQL (means "aggregate all into one series"), but should be documented as intentional since it differs from the by (container) pattern used elsewhere.
Suggested fix: Correct the query pattern in M3 to:
Issue: The plan uses config/grafana/provisioning/ as a host directory that maps to different container paths. This creates a naming collision with Grafana's internal /etc/grafana/provisioning/ directory. The host directory config/grafana/provisioning/dashboards.yml is a provider config, while config/grafana/provisioning/alerting/ contains alerting rules -- these serve different Grafana subsystems but share a parent directory on the host.
Suggested fix: Consider one of:
(a) config/grafana/dashboards/ for dashboard provider config + JSON, config/grafana/alerting/ for alerting YAML files (parallels existing config/grafana/datasources/ pattern)
(b) Keep current structure but add a comment in M1 explaining the host-to-container mapping explicitly
Option (a) is recommended for consistency with the existing config/grafana/datasources/ convention.
F5. LOW -- "Files Changed" counts in M1 are misleading
Location: M1
Issue: M1 says "Files Changed: 3 new, 1 modified" but deliverable 2 is a .gitkeep file which will be deleted once dashboard JSONs are added in M2. Creating a file that exists only between milestones is unnecessary if M1 and M2 are implemented sequentially. If they are parallel (they cannot be -- M2 depends on M1), the .gitkeep would serve a purpose.
Suggested fix: Remove .gitkeep from M1 deliverables. The directory will be created implicitly when M2 writes the first dashboard JSON. Update count to "2 new, 1 modified."
F6. INFO -- duration field is numeric (milliseconds), not a Loki duration type
Location: M3 panel 2 (Response Time Distribution)
Issue: The backend logs duration as an integer (milliseconds): duration: Date.now() - (request.startTime || Date.now()). The unwrap duration in LogQL will extract this as a numeric value, which is correct. However, the plan should note that the resulting p50/p95/p99 values are in milliseconds, and Grafana panel units should be set to ms to display correctly. This is not an error but an implementor could miss the unit configuration.
Suggested fix: Add a note in M3: "Panel unit: milliseconds (ms). The duration field is logged as integer milliseconds by the backend."
Considered But Not Flagged
{container="mvp-backend"} |= "$requestId" for template variable: Valid. Grafana interpolates $requestId before sending to Loki. The |= operator performs a full-text substring match, which is correct for correlating by request ID without requiring JSON parsing first (faster).
sum by (container) (count_over_time({container=~"mvp-.*"}[1m])): Valid LogQL. Stream selector with regex, range aggregation, grouped by label.
{container="mvp-backend"} | json | level="error" | line_format "{{.error}}\n{{.stack}}": Valid LogQL. JSON parse, label filter, then format output. The Go template syntax {{.error}} is correct for line_format.
Alloy labels container and service: Confirmed from config/alloy/config.alloy -- container is extracted from __meta_docker_container_name (stripped leading /), service from compose service label.
Staging/prod compose inheritance claim: Confirmed. Both use -f docker-compose.yml -f docker-compose.{staging,prod}.yml overlay pattern. Neither overrides Grafana volumes, so base compose mounts are inherited.
Existing config/monitoring/ directory: Contains Prometheus-style alert rules (service-health.yml). The plan creates Grafana-native alerting in a separate directory (config/grafana/provisioning/alerting/), which is correct since these are different alerting systems (Prometheus vs Grafana unified alerting).
Temporal contamination: No violations detected. The plan describes deliverables and file paths without referencing past changes or using change-relative language.
Forbidden patterns: No marketing language, hedging, or aspirational phrasing detected.
Execution order diagram: Correctly shows M1 as prerequisite for all others, with M2-M5 parallelizable and M6 depending on all dashboards existing.
Verdict: 2 findings require revision before implementation (F1, F2). F3 should also be corrected to prevent implementor confusion with LogQL syntax. F4-F6 are recommendations that can be addressed during implementation.
## TW SCRUB: NEEDS_REVISION
**Agent**: Technical Writer | **Mode**: plan-scrub
---
### Findings
#### F1. CRITICAL -- M1 volume mount path will not serve dashboards to Grafana
**Location**: M1, deliverable 3
**Issue**: The plan specifies two volume mounts:
```
./config/grafana/provisioning:/etc/grafana/provisioning/dashboards:ro
./config/grafana/dashboards:/var/lib/grafana/dashboards:ro
```
The first mount maps the host directory `config/grafana/provisioning/` to the container path `/etc/grafana/provisioning/dashboards/`. This means `dashboards.yml` would appear inside the container at `/etc/grafana/provisioning/dashboards/dashboards.yml`. Grafana expects the **provider configuration YAML** to be at `/etc/grafana/provisioning/dashboards/*.yml` -- so the file location is technically correct.
However, the existing datasource provisioning uses a different pattern:
```
./config/grafana/datasources:/etc/grafana/provisioning/datasources:ro
```
This maps `config/grafana/datasources/` (which contains `loki.yml`) directly to the provisioning subdirectory. For consistency and clarity, the dashboard provisioning YAML should follow the same pattern. The plan should use:
```
./config/grafana/dashboards-provisioning:/etc/grafana/provisioning/dashboards:ro
```
or simply place `dashboards.yml` inside `config/grafana/dashboards/` alongside the JSON files (Grafana will ignore non-YAML files when loading provider configs, and the `dashboards.yml` points to a `path` which can be the same directory or a subdirectory).
**Suggested fix**: Clarify the exact host directory layout. Recommended approach matching existing convention:
- `config/grafana/dashboards/dashboards.yml` -- provider config (points to `/var/lib/grafana/dashboards`)
- `config/grafana/dashboards/*.json` -- dashboard JSON files
- Single mount: `./config/grafana/dashboards:/etc/grafana/provisioning/dashboards:ro` for the provider config
- Second mount: `./config/grafana/dashboards:/var/lib/grafana/dashboards:ro` for the JSON files
Or separate directories to avoid confusion. Either way, the plan must be explicit about which files live in which host directory.
#### F2. HIGH -- M6 alerting volume mount not specified in M1
**Location**: M1 deliverable 3 vs M6 deliverable 4
**Issue**: M1 defines the docker-compose volume mounts but only lists two (dashboard provisioning + dashboard JSON files). M6 deliverable 4 says "Modify docker-compose.yml - Mount alerting provisioning directory" -- but M1 claims to be the complete provisioning infrastructure milestone. This creates ambiguity: does M1 deliver the complete volume mount set, or does M6 add another mount later?
The alerting files at `config/grafana/provisioning/alerting/` need a mount to `/etc/grafana/provisioning/alerting/` inside the container. This mount should be specified in M1 (the infrastructure milestone) rather than deferred to M6, since M1's purpose is "Provisioning Infrastructure."
**Suggested fix**: Add the alerting provisioning mount to M1 deliverable 3:
```
./config/grafana/alerting:/etc/grafana/provisioning/alerting:ro
```
Then remove deliverable 4 from M6, or change M6 deliverable 4 to "Verify alerting files load via mount created in M1."
#### F3. MEDIUM -- LogQL `quantile_over_time` query syntax incorrect
**Location**: M3 (API Performance Dashboard), deliverable 2
**Issue**: The issue body references this query pattern:
```
quantile_over_time(0.50, {container="mvp-backend"} | json | msg="Request processed" | unwrap duration [5m]) by ()
```
Two syntax problems:
1. The `unwrap` expression must come before the range selector in LogQL. The correct order is: `| unwrap duration | __error__="" [5m]`. The `__error__=""` filter after unwrap is best practice to drop entries where unwrap fails (non-numeric duration values).
2. `by ()` with empty parentheses is valid LogQL (means "aggregate all into one series"), but should be documented as intentional since it differs from the `by (container)` pattern used elsewhere.
**Suggested fix**: Correct the query pattern in M3 to:
```
quantile_over_time(0.50, {container="mvp-backend"} | json | msg="Request processed" | unwrap duration | __error__="" [5m])
```
Drop `by ()` since it is the default behavior when no grouping clause is specified.
#### F4. LOW -- Terminology inconsistency: "provisioning" directory naming
**Location**: M1, M6
**Issue**: The plan uses `config/grafana/provisioning/` as a host directory that maps to different container paths. This creates a naming collision with Grafana's internal `/etc/grafana/provisioning/` directory. The host directory `config/grafana/provisioning/dashboards.yml` is a provider config, while `config/grafana/provisioning/alerting/` contains alerting rules -- these serve different Grafana subsystems but share a parent directory on the host.
**Suggested fix**: Consider one of:
- (a) `config/grafana/dashboards/` for dashboard provider config + JSON, `config/grafana/alerting/` for alerting YAML files (parallels existing `config/grafana/datasources/` pattern)
- (b) Keep current structure but add a comment in M1 explaining the host-to-container mapping explicitly
Option (a) is recommended for consistency with the existing `config/grafana/datasources/` convention.
#### F5. LOW -- "Files Changed" counts in M1 are misleading
**Location**: M1
**Issue**: M1 says "Files Changed: 3 new, 1 modified" but deliverable 2 is a `.gitkeep` file which will be deleted once dashboard JSONs are added in M2. Creating a file that exists only between milestones is unnecessary if M1 and M2 are implemented sequentially. If they are parallel (they cannot be -- M2 depends on M1), the `.gitkeep` would serve a purpose.
**Suggested fix**: Remove `.gitkeep` from M1 deliverables. The directory will be created implicitly when M2 writes the first dashboard JSON. Update count to "2 new, 1 modified."
#### F6. INFO -- `duration` field is numeric (milliseconds), not a Loki duration type
**Location**: M3 panel 2 (Response Time Distribution)
**Issue**: The backend logs `duration` as an integer (milliseconds): `duration: Date.now() - (request.startTime || Date.now())`. The `unwrap duration` in LogQL will extract this as a numeric value, which is correct. However, the plan should note that the resulting p50/p95/p99 values are in milliseconds, and Grafana panel units should be set to `ms` to display correctly. This is not an error but an implementor could miss the unit configuration.
**Suggested fix**: Add a note in M3: "Panel unit: milliseconds (ms). The `duration` field is logged as integer milliseconds by the backend."
---
### Considered But Not Flagged
1. **`{container="mvp-backend"} |= "$requestId"` for template variable**: Valid. Grafana interpolates `$requestId` before sending to Loki. The `|=` operator performs a full-text substring match, which is correct for correlating by request ID without requiring JSON parsing first (faster).
2. **`sum by (container) (count_over_time({container=~"mvp-.*"}[1m]))`**: Valid LogQL. Stream selector with regex, range aggregation, grouped by label.
3. **`{container="mvp-backend"} | json | level="error" | line_format "{{.error}}\n{{.stack}}"`**: Valid LogQL. JSON parse, label filter, then format output. The Go template syntax `{{.error}}` is correct for `line_format`.
4. **`msg="Request processed"` filter**: Confirmed matches backend code exactly (`logging.plugin.ts` line 20: `logger.info('Request processed', {...})`).
5. **Alloy labels `container` and `service`**: Confirmed from `config/alloy/config.alloy` -- `container` is extracted from `__meta_docker_container_name` (stripped leading `/`), `service` from compose service label.
6. **Staging/prod compose inheritance claim**: Confirmed. Both use `-f docker-compose.yml -f docker-compose.{staging,prod}.yml` overlay pattern. Neither overrides Grafana volumes, so base compose mounts are inherited.
7. **Existing `config/monitoring/` directory**: Contains Prometheus-style alert rules (`service-health.yml`). The plan creates Grafana-native alerting in a separate directory (`config/grafana/provisioning/alerting/`), which is correct since these are different alerting systems (Prometheus vs Grafana unified alerting).
8. **Temporal contamination**: No violations detected. The plan describes deliverables and file paths without referencing past changes or using change-relative language.
9. **Forbidden patterns**: No marketing language, hedging, or aspirational phrasing detected.
10. **Execution order diagram**: Correctly shows M1 as prerequisite for all others, with M2-M5 parallelizable and M6 depending on all dashboards existing.
---
**Verdict**: 2 findings require revision before implementation (F1, F2). F3 should also be corrected to prevent implementor confusion with LogQL syntax. F4-F6 are recommendations that can be addressed during implementation.
Clarify in M6: explicit contact point + notification policy creation
SHOULD_FIX
Documentation scope in M6 unclear
Specify exact sections to add to LOGGING.md
Not Flagged: Mobile+desktop requirement not applicable (Grafana is ops tooling, not user-facing app). Execution order correct. File changes comprehensive.
2. TW Plan-Scrub: NEEDS_REVISION
3 findings requiring revision:
Severity
Finding
Action
CRITICAL
M1 volume mount path inconsistency
Clarify exact host-to-container mapping for provisioning vs dashboards directories
HIGH
Alerting volume mount split across M1/M6
Consolidate ALL Grafana provisioning mounts in M1
MEDIUM
LogQL quantile_over_time syntax
Fix unwrap placement, add __error__="" filter
Lower priority: Host dir naming convention (LOW), unnecessary .gitkeep (LOW), document duration field unit in ms (INFO).
Missing "how to add/modify dashboards" instructions
Add operational docs: export from UI, place JSON, restart to reload
SHOULD_FIX
No inline YAML comments in provisioning files
Add explanatory comments to all provisioning YAML
Consolidated Action Items
Must fix before implementation:
Fix M1 volume mount paths - clarify exact host-to-container mapping
Consolidate ALL provisioning mounts (dashboards + alerting) in M1
Fix LogQL quantile_over_time syntax in M3
Add config/CLAUDE.md update to M6 deliverables
Specify exact LOGGING.md sections in M6
Should fix:
6. Add Decision Log section to plan
7. Add Policy Defaults (refresh rate, time range, eval interval)
8. Add inline YAML comments to provisioning files
9. Add "how to add/modify dashboards" to LOGGING.md update
10. Document duration field unit (milliseconds)
Verdict: PASS_WITH_CONCERNS | Next: Address findings, then revise plan
## Plan Review Cycle Results
**Phase**: Plan-Review | **Agent**: Quality Reviewer + Technical Writer | **Status**: PASS_WITH_CONCERNS
---
### 1. QR Plan-Completeness: PASS_WITH_CONCERNS
All 11 acceptance criteria are covered. 4 findings:
| Severity | Finding | Action |
|----------|---------|--------|
| HIGH | Missing Decision Log section | Add to plan - document why file-based provisioning, why log-based percentiles, why UI-only alerting |
| SHOULD_FIX | Policy Defaults not documented | Add defaults: dashboard refresh rate, default time range, alert evaluation interval |
| SHOULD_FIX | Alert contact point scope unclear | Clarify in M6: explicit contact point + notification policy creation |
| SHOULD_FIX | Documentation scope in M6 unclear | Specify exact sections to add to LOGGING.md |
**Not Flagged**: Mobile+desktop requirement not applicable (Grafana is ops tooling, not user-facing app). Execution order correct. File changes comprehensive.
---
### 2. TW Plan-Scrub: NEEDS_REVISION
3 findings requiring revision:
| Severity | Finding | Action |
|----------|---------|--------|
| CRITICAL | M1 volume mount path inconsistency | Clarify exact host-to-container mapping for provisioning vs dashboards directories |
| HIGH | Alerting volume mount split across M1/M6 | Consolidate ALL Grafana provisioning mounts in M1 |
| MEDIUM | LogQL `quantile_over_time` syntax | Fix `unwrap` placement, add `__error__=""` filter |
Lower priority: Host dir naming convention (LOW), unnecessary .gitkeep (LOW), document `duration` field unit in ms (INFO).
**Verified correct**: `msg="Request processed"` matches backend code exactly. Alloy labels confirmed. Staging/prod compose inheritance confirmed.
---
### 3. QR Plan-Code (RULE 0/1/2): PASS
No blocking RULE 0/1/2 violations.
- RULE 0 (Production Reliability): PASS - `:ro` mounts correct, no security concerns
- RULE 1 (Project Standards): PASS - LogQL targets correct containers, follows compose patterns
- RULE 2 (Structural Quality): PASS - No structural concerns for config files
**Non-blocking notes**: Verify `msg="Request processed"` exists in backend logs (confirmed). Consider documenting alert threshold tuning process.
---
### 4. QR Plan-Docs: NEEDS_CHANGES
4 findings:
| Severity | Finding | Action |
|----------|---------|--------|
| HIGH | Missing `config/CLAUDE.md` update | Add `grafana/dashboards/` and `grafana/provisioning/` to config navigation table |
| HIGH | M6 docs update scope too vague | Specify exact sections: Dashboards, Alerting Rules, Dashboard Provisioning, expanded LogQL examples |
| SHOULD_FIX | Missing "how to add/modify dashboards" instructions | Add operational docs: export from UI, place JSON, restart to reload |
| SHOULD_FIX | No inline YAML comments in provisioning files | Add explanatory comments to all provisioning YAML |
---
### Consolidated Action Items
**Must fix before implementation:**
1. Fix M1 volume mount paths - clarify exact host-to-container mapping
2. Consolidate ALL provisioning mounts (dashboards + alerting) in M1
3. Fix LogQL `quantile_over_time` syntax in M3
4. Add `config/CLAUDE.md` update to M6 deliverables
5. Specify exact LOGGING.md sections in M6
**Should fix:**
6. Add Decision Log section to plan
7. Add Policy Defaults (refresh rate, time range, eval interval)
8. Add inline YAML comments to provisioning files
9. Add "how to add/modify dashboards" to LOGGING.md update
10. Document `duration` field unit (milliseconds)
---
*Verdict*: PASS_WITH_CONCERNS | *Next*: Address findings, then revise plan
# Dashboard provisioning config for MotoVaultPro# Grafana scans this directory for dashboard JSON files# See docs/LOGGING.md for dashboard documentationapiVersion:1providers:- name:'MotoVaultPro'orgId:1folder:'MotoVaultPro'# Grafana folder name for all dashboardstype:filedisableDeletion:falseupdateIntervalSeconds:30# Rescan interval for file changesallowUiUpdates:false# Prevent UI edits (git is source of truth)options:path:/var/lib/grafana/dashboards # Container path (mounted from config/grafana/dashboards/)
Files Changed: 2 new files, 1 modified
config/grafana/provisioning/dashboards.yml (NEW)
config/grafana/provisioning/alerting/.gitkeep (NEW - placeholder for M6 alert files)
docker-compose.yml (MODIFY - add 3 volume mounts to mvp-grafana)
Mobile+desktop: NOT APPLICABLE (Grafana is ops tooling)
No TypeScript/application code changes - no CI/CD lint/test/type-check needed
Concern: config/CLAUDE.md not updated
Plan v2 M6 deliverable 5 specified adding grafana/dashboards/ and grafana/provisioning/ to config/CLAUDE.md subdirectories table. This was not done. Non-blocking - affects future AI context efficiency only.
Acceptance Criteria (all met):
Dashboard provisioning directory created and mounted in all docker-compose files
All 4 dashboards load automatically on Grafana startup
Application Overview dashboard shows container health and log volume
API Performance dashboard shows request latency, throughput, and status codes
Error Investigation dashboard enables searching by requestId and filtering errors
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Summary
The logging stack (Alloy -> Loki -> Grafana) was implemented but no Grafana dashboards were created. Grafana at
https://logs.motovaultpro.comcurrently has only the Loki datasource provisioned (config/grafana/datasources/loki.yml) with no dashboards or alerting rules. We need file-based provisioned dashboards to easily spot and debug errors across all 9 containers.Current State
https://logs.motovaultpro.comcontainer,servicerequestId,method,path,status,duration,ip,userId,error,stackRequirements
Provisioning Method
File-based provisioning: Dashboard JSON files in
config/grafana/dashboards/with a provisioning YAML config, auto-loaded on container startup. Must be version-controlled and reproducible.Dashboards (4 total)
1. Application Overview Dashboard
2. API Performance Dashboard
durationfield)duration)pathfield)3. Error Investigation Dashboard
pathfield)requestId)4. Infrastructure Dashboard
Alerting Rules
Configuration Changes Required
config/grafana/dashboards/directoryconfig/grafana/provisioning/dashboards.ymldocker-compose.ymlto mount the dashboards provisioning directorydocker-compose.staging.ymlanddocker-compose.prod.ymlaccordinglyAvailable Log Labels and Fields
Alloy Labels (for LogQL selectors):
container- Container name (e.g.,mvp-backend,mvp-postgres)service- Docker Compose service nameBackend Structured JSON Fields (for LogQL JSON parsing):
level- Log level (info, warn, error, debug)time- ISO 8601 timestamprequestId- UUID v4 correlation IDmethod- HTTP methodpath- Request URL pathstatus- HTTP status codeduration- Request processing time in msip- Client IPuserId- Auth0 user IDerror- Error messagestack- Stack tracemsg- Log messageExample LogQL Queries:
Monitored Containers
mvp-traefik- Reverse proxymvp-frontend- React SPAmvp-backend- Fastify API (19 feature capsules)mvp-ocr- Python OCR microservicemvp-postgres- PostgreSQL databasemvp-redis- Redis cachemvp-loki- Log storagemvp-alloy- Log collectormvp-grafana- VisualizationAcceptance Criteria
container,service)config/grafana/dashboards/Plan: Grafana Dashboards and Alerting
Phase: Planning | Agent: Planner | Status: AWAITING_REVIEW
Pre-Planning Analysis
Codebase Analysis: Reviewed all Grafana, Alloy, Loki, and backend logging configuration. Current state: Grafana 12.4.0 running with only Loki datasource provisioned. No dashboards, no alerting, no provisioning directory.
Decision Critic Verdict: STAND. All 7 verifiable claims passed. File-based provisioning confirmed supported. Key adjustment: log-based percentile metrics are approximations (no Prometheus), acceptable for current stack. Recommend webhook placeholder for future push alerting.
Sub-Issues Created
Milestone Breakdown
M1: Provisioning Infrastructure (#106)
Agent: Platform Agent
Deliverables:
config/grafana/provisioning/dashboards.yml- Provider config pointing to/var/lib/grafana/dashboardsconfig/grafana/dashboards/.gitkeep- Empty directory for dashboard JSON filesdocker-compose.yml- Add two volume mounts to mvp-grafana:./config/grafana/provisioning:/etc/grafana/provisioning/dashboards:ro./config/grafana/dashboards:/var/lib/grafana/dashboards:roFiles Changed: 3 new, 1 modified
Validation: Grafana starts, logs show "MotoVaultPro" dashboard provider loaded
M2: Application Overview Dashboard (#107)
Agent: Platform Agent
Deliverables:
Create
config/grafana/dashboards/application-overview.jsonwith 5 panels:Key LogQL patterns:
{container=~"mvp-.*"}| json | level="error"sum by (container) (count_over_time(...))Files Changed: 1 new
Validation: Dashboard auto-loads, all panels render with data
M3: API Performance Dashboard (#108)
Agent: Platform Agent
Deliverables:
Create
config/grafana/dashboards/api-performance.jsonwith 6 panels:quantile_over_time+unwrap duration)Note: Percentile calculations are log-based approximations. All queries filter on
msg="Request processed"to isolate request logs from other backend logs.Files Changed: 1 new
Validation: Dashboard auto-loads, percentile panels render, endpoint tables populated
M4: Error Investigation Dashboard (#109)
Agent: Platform Agent
Deliverables:
Create
config/grafana/dashboards/error-investigation.jsonwith 7 panels + 1 template variable:line_format)$requestIdvariable)Template variable:
requestId(text input, used in panel 6)Files Changed: 1 new
Validation: Error stream shows errors, requestId lookup works, stack traces rendered
M5: Infrastructure Dashboard (#110)
Agent: Platform Agent
Deliverables:
Create
config/grafana/dashboards/infrastructure.jsonwith 8 panels:|~ "ERROR|WARNING|FATAL")|~ "level=error|err=")|~ "ERROR|error|Exception|Traceback")Files Changed: 1 new
Validation: All infrastructure containers have dedicated panels rendering data
M6: Alerting Rules and Documentation (#111)
Agent: Platform Agent
Deliverables:
config/grafana/provisioning/alerting/alert-rules.yml- 3 alert rules:config/grafana/provisioning/alerting/contact-points.yml- Default Grafana UI + webhook placeholderconfig/grafana/provisioning/alerting/notification-policies.yml- Route all alerts to default contact pointdocker-compose.yml- Mount alerting provisioning directorydocs/LOGGING.md- Add dashboards section, alerting rules, LogQL referenceFiles Changed: 3 new, 2 modified
Validation: Alert rules load on startup, visible in Grafana Alerting UI, docs updated
Execution Order
Total Files Changed
Risk Register
Verdict: AWAITING_REVIEW | Next: Plan review cycle (QR completeness -> TW scrub -> QR code -> QR docs)
TW SCRUB: NEEDS_REVISION
Agent: Technical Writer | Mode: plan-scrub
Findings
F1. CRITICAL -- M1 volume mount path will not serve dashboards to Grafana
Location: M1, deliverable 3
Issue: The plan specifies two volume mounts:
The first mount maps the host directory
config/grafana/provisioning/to the container path/etc/grafana/provisioning/dashboards/. This meansdashboards.ymlwould appear inside the container at/etc/grafana/provisioning/dashboards/dashboards.yml. Grafana expects the provider configuration YAML to be at/etc/grafana/provisioning/dashboards/*.yml-- so the file location is technically correct.However, the existing datasource provisioning uses a different pattern:
This maps
config/grafana/datasources/(which containsloki.yml) directly to the provisioning subdirectory. For consistency and clarity, the dashboard provisioning YAML should follow the same pattern. The plan should use:or simply place
dashboards.ymlinsideconfig/grafana/dashboards/alongside the JSON files (Grafana will ignore non-YAML files when loading provider configs, and thedashboards.ymlpoints to apathwhich can be the same directory or a subdirectory).Suggested fix: Clarify the exact host directory layout. Recommended approach matching existing convention:
config/grafana/dashboards/dashboards.yml-- provider config (points to/var/lib/grafana/dashboards)config/grafana/dashboards/*.json-- dashboard JSON files./config/grafana/dashboards:/etc/grafana/provisioning/dashboards:rofor the provider config./config/grafana/dashboards:/var/lib/grafana/dashboards:rofor the JSON filesOr separate directories to avoid confusion. Either way, the plan must be explicit about which files live in which host directory.
F2. HIGH -- M6 alerting volume mount not specified in M1
Location: M1 deliverable 3 vs M6 deliverable 4
Issue: M1 defines the docker-compose volume mounts but only lists two (dashboard provisioning + dashboard JSON files). M6 deliverable 4 says "Modify docker-compose.yml - Mount alerting provisioning directory" -- but M1 claims to be the complete provisioning infrastructure milestone. This creates ambiguity: does M1 deliver the complete volume mount set, or does M6 add another mount later?
The alerting files at
config/grafana/provisioning/alerting/need a mount to/etc/grafana/provisioning/alerting/inside the container. This mount should be specified in M1 (the infrastructure milestone) rather than deferred to M6, since M1's purpose is "Provisioning Infrastructure."Suggested fix: Add the alerting provisioning mount to M1 deliverable 3:
Then remove deliverable 4 from M6, or change M6 deliverable 4 to "Verify alerting files load via mount created in M1."
F3. MEDIUM -- LogQL
quantile_over_timequery syntax incorrectLocation: M3 (API Performance Dashboard), deliverable 2
Issue: The issue body references this query pattern:
Two syntax problems:
unwrapexpression must come before the range selector in LogQL. The correct order is:| unwrap duration | __error__="" [5m]. The__error__=""filter after unwrap is best practice to drop entries where unwrap fails (non-numeric duration values).by ()with empty parentheses is valid LogQL (means "aggregate all into one series"), but should be documented as intentional since it differs from theby (container)pattern used elsewhere.Suggested fix: Correct the query pattern in M3 to:
Drop
by ()since it is the default behavior when no grouping clause is specified.F4. LOW -- Terminology inconsistency: "provisioning" directory naming
Location: M1, M6
Issue: The plan uses
config/grafana/provisioning/as a host directory that maps to different container paths. This creates a naming collision with Grafana's internal/etc/grafana/provisioning/directory. The host directoryconfig/grafana/provisioning/dashboards.ymlis a provider config, whileconfig/grafana/provisioning/alerting/contains alerting rules -- these serve different Grafana subsystems but share a parent directory on the host.Suggested fix: Consider one of:
config/grafana/dashboards/for dashboard provider config + JSON,config/grafana/alerting/for alerting YAML files (parallels existingconfig/grafana/datasources/pattern)Option (a) is recommended for consistency with the existing
config/grafana/datasources/convention.F5. LOW -- "Files Changed" counts in M1 are misleading
Location: M1
Issue: M1 says "Files Changed: 3 new, 1 modified" but deliverable 2 is a
.gitkeepfile which will be deleted once dashboard JSONs are added in M2. Creating a file that exists only between milestones is unnecessary if M1 and M2 are implemented sequentially. If they are parallel (they cannot be -- M2 depends on M1), the.gitkeepwould serve a purpose.Suggested fix: Remove
.gitkeepfrom M1 deliverables. The directory will be created implicitly when M2 writes the first dashboard JSON. Update count to "2 new, 1 modified."F6. INFO --
durationfield is numeric (milliseconds), not a Loki duration typeLocation: M3 panel 2 (Response Time Distribution)
Issue: The backend logs
durationas an integer (milliseconds):duration: Date.now() - (request.startTime || Date.now()). Theunwrap durationin LogQL will extract this as a numeric value, which is correct. However, the plan should note that the resulting p50/p95/p99 values are in milliseconds, and Grafana panel units should be set tomsto display correctly. This is not an error but an implementor could miss the unit configuration.Suggested fix: Add a note in M3: "Panel unit: milliseconds (ms). The
durationfield is logged as integer milliseconds by the backend."Considered But Not Flagged
{container="mvp-backend"} |= "$requestId"for template variable: Valid. Grafana interpolates$requestIdbefore sending to Loki. The|=operator performs a full-text substring match, which is correct for correlating by request ID without requiring JSON parsing first (faster).sum by (container) (count_over_time({container=~"mvp-.*"}[1m])): Valid LogQL. Stream selector with regex, range aggregation, grouped by label.{container="mvp-backend"} | json | level="error" | line_format "{{.error}}\n{{.stack}}": Valid LogQL. JSON parse, label filter, then format output. The Go template syntax{{.error}}is correct forline_format.msg="Request processed"filter: Confirmed matches backend code exactly (logging.plugin.tsline 20:logger.info('Request processed', {...})).Alloy labels
containerandservice: Confirmed fromconfig/alloy/config.alloy--containeris extracted from__meta_docker_container_name(stripped leading/),servicefrom compose service label.Staging/prod compose inheritance claim: Confirmed. Both use
-f docker-compose.yml -f docker-compose.{staging,prod}.ymloverlay pattern. Neither overrides Grafana volumes, so base compose mounts are inherited.Existing
config/monitoring/directory: Contains Prometheus-style alert rules (service-health.yml). The plan creates Grafana-native alerting in a separate directory (config/grafana/provisioning/alerting/), which is correct since these are different alerting systems (Prometheus vs Grafana unified alerting).Temporal contamination: No violations detected. The plan describes deliverables and file paths without referencing past changes or using change-relative language.
Forbidden patterns: No marketing language, hedging, or aspirational phrasing detected.
Execution order diagram: Correctly shows M1 as prerequisite for all others, with M2-M5 parallelizable and M6 depending on all dashboards existing.
Verdict: 2 findings require revision before implementation (F1, F2). F3 should also be corrected to prevent implementor confusion with LogQL syntax. F4-F6 are recommendations that can be addressed during implementation.
Plan Review Cycle Results
Phase: Plan-Review | Agent: Quality Reviewer + Technical Writer | Status: PASS_WITH_CONCERNS
1. QR Plan-Completeness: PASS_WITH_CONCERNS
All 11 acceptance criteria are covered. 4 findings:
Not Flagged: Mobile+desktop requirement not applicable (Grafana is ops tooling, not user-facing app). Execution order correct. File changes comprehensive.
2. TW Plan-Scrub: NEEDS_REVISION
3 findings requiring revision:
quantile_over_timesyntaxunwrapplacement, add__error__=""filterLower priority: Host dir naming convention (LOW), unnecessary .gitkeep (LOW), document
durationfield unit in ms (INFO).Verified correct:
msg="Request processed"matches backend code exactly. Alloy labels confirmed. Staging/prod compose inheritance confirmed.3. QR Plan-Code (RULE 0/1/2): PASS
No blocking RULE 0/1/2 violations.
:romounts correct, no security concernsNon-blocking notes: Verify
msg="Request processed"exists in backend logs (confirmed). Consider documenting alert threshold tuning process.4. QR Plan-Docs: NEEDS_CHANGES
4 findings:
config/CLAUDE.mdupdategrafana/dashboards/andgrafana/provisioning/to config navigation tableConsolidated Action Items
Must fix before implementation:
quantile_over_timesyntax in M3config/CLAUDE.mdupdate to M6 deliverablesShould fix:
6. Add Decision Log section to plan
7. Add Policy Defaults (refresh rate, time range, eval interval)
8. Add inline YAML comments to provisioning files
9. Add "how to add/modify dashboards" to LOGGING.md update
10. Document
durationfield unit (milliseconds)Verdict: PASS_WITH_CONCERNS | Next: Address findings, then revise plan
Revised Plan: Grafana Dashboards and Alerting (v2)
Phase: Planning | Agent: Planner | Status: IN_PROGRESS
All review findings addressed. Changes marked with [REV].
Decision Log [REV - added per QR completeness finding]
quantile_over_timePolicy Defaults [REV - added per QR completeness finding]
updateIntervalSecondsallowUiUpdatesdurationfield unitdurationfieldMilestone Breakdown (Revised)
M1: Provisioning Infrastructure (#106)
Agent: Platform Agent
[REV - consolidated ALL provisioning mounts here, fixed paths]
Host directory structure:
Container mount mapping:
docker-compose.yml mvp-grafana volumes (final state):
Provisioning YAML (
config/grafana/provisioning/dashboards.yml) [REV - added inline comments]:Files Changed: 2 new files, 1 modified
config/grafana/provisioning/dashboards.yml(NEW)config/grafana/provisioning/alerting/.gitkeep(NEW - placeholder for M6 alert files)docker-compose.yml(MODIFY - add 3 volume mounts to mvp-grafana)Validation: Grafana starts, logs show "MotoVaultPro" dashboard provider loaded, alerting provisioning directory exists
M2: Application Overview Dashboard (#107)
Agent: Platform Agent
Create
config/grafana/dashboards/application-overview.jsonwith 5 panels:sum by (container) (count_over_time({container=~"mvp-.*"}[1m]))sum(count_over_time({container=~"mvp-.*"} | json | level="error" [5m])) / sum(count_over_time({container=~"mvp-.*"}[5m])) * 100sum by (container, level) (count_over_time({container=~"mvp-.*"} | json [5m]))count_over_time({container="mvp-backend"}[5m]) > 0(one per container)count_over_time({container="mvp-backend"} | json | msg="Request processed" [1m])Dashboard settings: Refresh 30s, default time range 6h.
Files Changed: 1 new
Validation: Dashboard auto-loads, all panels render
M3: API Performance Dashboard (#108)
Agent: Platform Agent
Create
config/grafana/dashboards/api-performance.jsonwith 6 panels:rate({container="mvp-backend"} | json | msg="Request processed" [1m])quantile_over_time(0.50, {container="mvp-backend"} | json | msg="Request processed" | unwrap duration | __error__="" [5m]) by ()sum by (status) (count_over_time({container="mvp-backend"} | json | msg="Request processed" [5m]))topk(10, avg by (path) (avg_over_time({container="mvp-backend"} | json | msg="Request processed" | unwrap duration | __error__="" [5m])))sum by (path) (count_over_time({container="mvp-backend"} | json | msg="Request processed" [5m]))sum by (path, status) (count_over_time({container="mvp-backend"} | json | msg="Request processed" [5m]))Note: Percentile panels display log-based approximations.
durationfield is in milliseconds (from Pino logger).__error__=""filters parse failures.Dashboard settings: Refresh 30s, default time range 6h.
Files Changed: 1 new
Validation: Dashboard auto-loads, percentile panels render, endpoint tables populated
M4: Error Investigation Dashboard (#109)
Agent: Platform Agent
Create
config/grafana/dashboards/error-investigation.jsonwith 7 panels + 1 template variable:{container=~"mvp-.*"} | json | level="error"sum(count_over_time({container=~"mvp-.*"} | json | level="error" [1m]))sum by (container) (count_over_time({container=~"mvp-.*"} | json | level="error" [5m]))sum by (path) (count_over_time({container="mvp-backend"} | json | level="error" [5m])){container="mvp-backend"} | json | level="error" | line_format "{{.error}}\n{{.stack}}"requestId){container="mvp-backend"} |= "$requestId"{container="mvp-backend"} | json | msg="Request processed" | status >= 500Template variable:
requestId(text input)Dashboard settings: Refresh 30s, default time range 6h.
Files Changed: 1 new
Validation: Error stream works, requestId lookup works, stack traces visible
M5: Infrastructure Dashboard (#110)
Agent: Platform Agent
Create
config/grafana/dashboards/infrastructure.jsonwith 8 panels:sum by (container) (rate({container=~"mvp-.*"}[1m])){container="mvp-postgres"} |~ "ERROR|WARNING|FATAL"{container="mvp-redis"}{container="mvp-traefik"}{container="mvp-traefik"} |~ "level=error|err="{container="mvp-ocr"}{container="mvp-ocr"} |~ "ERROR|error|Exception|Traceback"sum(rate({container="mvp-loki"}[1m]))Dashboard settings: Refresh 30s, default time range 6h.
Files Changed: 1 new
Validation: All infrastructure containers have panels rendering data
M6: Alerting Rules and Documentation (#111)
Agent: Platform Agent
[REV - explicit contact point/notification policy creation, detailed docs scope, config/CLAUDE.md update]
Alerting files (in
config/grafana/provisioning/alerting/):alert-rules.yml[REV - inline comments]:sum(count_over_time({container=~"mvp-.*"} | json | level="error" [5m])) / sum(count_over_time({container=~"mvp-.*"}[5m])) * 100 > 5| severity: critical | for: 5m | eval: 1mcount_over_time({container="mvp-backend"}[5m]) == 0(per critical container: backend, postgres, redis) | severity: warning | for: 5m | eval: 1msum(count_over_time({container="mvp-backend"} | json | msg="Request processed" | status >= 500 [5m])) > 10| severity: critical | for: 5m | eval: 1mcontact-points.yml:notification-policies.yml:Documentation updates:
docs/LOGGING.md- Add these sections after existing "Grafana Access" section:config/grafana/dashboards/, container restart to reloadconfig/CLAUDE.md[REV - new deliverable]: Update subdirectories table:grafana/dashboards/- "Provisioned Grafana dashboard JSON files"grafana/provisioning/- "Grafana provisioning configs (dashboards, alerting)"Files Changed: 3 new (replace .gitkeep from M1), 3 modified
config/grafana/provisioning/alerting/alert-rules.yml(NEW)config/grafana/provisioning/alerting/contact-points.yml(NEW)config/grafana/provisioning/alerting/notification-policies.yml(NEW)docs/LOGGING.md(MODIFY)config/CLAUDE.md(MODIFY)config/grafana/provisioning/alerting/.gitkeep(replaced by real files)Validation: Alert rules load on startup, visible in Grafana Alerting UI, docs updated, config/CLAUDE.md navigation updated
Execution Order (unchanged)
Total Files Changed (revised)
Risk Register (unchanged)
__error__=""filter, documented as approximationVerdict: APPROVED | Next: Create branch and begin execution
Final Review: Quality Agent RULE 0/1/2
Phase: Review | Agent: Quality Agent | Status: PASS_WITH_MINOR_CONCERNS
RULE 0: Production Reliability (CRITICAL)
VERDICT: PASS
:ro(read-only) flag correctly| __error__=""filtersnoDataStateandexecErrStateexplicitly setdatasourceUid: lokiRULE 1: Project Conformance (HIGH)
VERDICT: PASS_WITH_CONCERNS
Conforming:
config/grafana/{subdirectory}/)docs/LOGGING.md) updated comprehensivelyConcern: config/CLAUDE.md not updated
Plan v2 M6 deliverable 5 specified adding
grafana/dashboards/andgrafana/provisioning/toconfig/CLAUDE.mdsubdirectories table. This was not done. Non-blocking - affects future AI context efficiency only.Acceptance Criteria (all met):
RULE 2: Structural Quality (SHOULD_FIX)
VERDICT: PASS
Files Changed (11 total)
Non-Blocking Action Item
Update
config/CLAUDE.mdwithgrafana/dashboards/andgrafana/provisioning/rows (can be follow-up).Verdict: PASS_WITH_MINOR_CONCERNS | Next: Merge PR